linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] microblaze: Fix unistd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dca4637c-abfc-851f-0a70-873351be1837@xilinx.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:17:23 +0100
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, git@...inx.com,
        Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
        Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: Fix unistd_32.h generation format

On 12. 02. 20 9:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:42 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12. 02. 20 9:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:56 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Generated files are also checked by sparse that's why add newline
>>>> to remove sparse (C=1) warning:
>>>> ./arch/microblaze/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h:438:45:
>>>> warning: no newline at end of file
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@...inx.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>
>>> The patch looks good, but if you don't mind respinning it, could respin
>>> it to do the same thing for all architectures at once? I see that  some
>>> already have it, but most don't.
>>
>> I have not a problem to do so. I expect that this can be taken via your
>> tree that I can create only one patch. If this should go via
>> architectures tree would be better to create separate one.
> 
> Yes, I can take that into the asm-generic tree, or maybe you can just send it
> to Andrew Morton.

v2 sent.

M