lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:35:43 +0100
From:   Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, olvaffe@...il.com,
        gurchetansingh@...omium.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/virtio: add drm_driver.release callback.

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 03:27:11PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Split virtio_gpu_deinit(), move the drm shutdown and release to
> > virtio_gpu_release().  Drop vqs_ready variable, instead use
> > drm_dev_{enter,exit,unplug} to avoid touching hardware after
> > device removal.  Tidy up here and there.
> > 
> > v4: add changelog.
> > v3: use drm_dev_*().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
> 
> Looks reasonable I think.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> 
> I didn't review whether you need more drm_dev_enter/exit pairs, virtio is
> a bit more complex for that and I have no idea how exactly it works.

virtio uses two rings to send commands to the device, one to move the
cursor and one for everything else.  So pretty much everything ends up
calling either this ...

> > @@ -330,7 +330,14 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,

... or this ...

> > @@ -460,12 +460,13 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_cursor(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,

... to submit some request to the (virtual) hardware.  Therefore we
don't need many drm_dev_enter/exit pairs to cover everything ;)

cheers,
  Gerd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ