[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200212101108.GE14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:11:08 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xue.zhihong@....com.cn,
wang.liang82@....com.cn, Huang Zijiang <huang.zijiang@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Use kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of
kmem_cache_alloc() with flag GFP_ZERO.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 05:54:21PM +0800, Yi Wang wrote:
> From: Huang Zijiang <huang.zijiang@....com.cn>
>
> Use kmem_cache_zalloc instead of manually setting kmem_cache_alloc
> with flag GFP_ZERO since kzalloc sets allocated memory
> to zero.
>
> Change in v2:
> add indation
Why? Isn't this more or less a whitespace change?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists