linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 24/28] sound: Call cpu_latency_qos_*() instead of pm_qos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200212101840.GB4028@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:18:40 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/28] sound: Call cpu_latency_qos_*() instead of
 pm_qos_*()

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:34:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Call cpu_latency_qos_add/update/remove_request() and
> cpu_latency_qos_request_active() instead of
> pm_qos_add/update/remove_request() and pm_qos_request_active(),
> respectively, because the latter are going to be dropped.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)