linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: Document JZ47xx VPU auxiliary processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200212020707.GA29808@bogus>
Date:   Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:07:07 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, od@...c.me,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: Document JZ47xx VPU auxiliary
 processor

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:26:09 -0300, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Inside the Video Processing Unit (VPU) of the recent JZ47xx SoCs from
> Ingenic is a second Xburst MIPS CPU very similar to the main core.
> This document describes the devicetree bindings for this auxiliary
> processor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v2: Update TCSM0 address in example
>     v3: Change node name to 'video-decoder'
>     v4: Convert to YAML. I didn't add Rob's Ack on v3 because of that (sorry Rob)
>     v5: - Fix 'reg' not in <addr, len> pairs
>         - Add missing include to devicetree example
> 
>  .../bindings/remoteproc/ingenic,vpu.yaml      | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ingenic,vpu.yaml
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.