[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200212115717.GA2667@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:57:17 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
"David E . Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/18] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Log more
information if SCU IPC command fails
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 01:54:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > You mean move outside of the lock? This one calls ipc_data_readl()
> > which should be under the lock.
>
> I meant to move dev_err() out of the lock. The rest of course requires to stay
> under it.
OK, got it :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists