linux-kernel - Re: i2c: jz4780: silence log flood on txabrt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:59:55 +0100
From:   "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Paul Boddie <paul@...die.org.uk>,
        Alex Smith <alex.smith@...tec.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...e.cz>,
        Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org, kernel@...a-handheld.com
Subject: Re: i2c: jz4780: silence log flood on txabrt


> Am 12.02.2020 um 15:53 schrieb Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>>> Sorry, normally I don't do counter patches. Yet, this time I realized
>>> that it would be faster to actually do what I envisioned than to
>>> describe it in words. I hope you don't feel offended.
>> 
>> No problem. I had thought a little about that myself, but did not
>> dare to solve more than my problem...
> 
> Glad you like it. Well, it still kinda solves your problem only, because
> there are still too many dev_err in there, but I think this is good
> enough for now.
> 
>>> Obviously, I can't test, does it work for you?
>> 
>> Yes,it works.
> 
> Good!
> 
>> Do you want to push your patch yourself, or should I add it to my
>> patch series and resubmit in a v2?
> 
> I'll apply the patch to my tree directly as a bugfix for 5.6. You can
> drop the I2C list from V2 then.

Ok, fine.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus