lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:37:05 -0600
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
        Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] soundwire: intel: free all resources
 on hw_free()

Hi Vinod,

>> +static int intel_free_stream(struct sdw_intel *sdw,
>> +			     struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> +			     struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
>> +			     int link_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct sdw_intel_link_res *res = sdw->link_res;
>> +	struct sdw_intel_stream_free_data free_data;
> 
> where is this struct sdw_intel_stream_free_data defined. I dont see it
> in this patch or this series..

the definition is already upstream :-)

It was added in December with

4b206d34b92224 ('soundwire: intel: update stream callbacks for 
hwparams/free stream operations')

>> -	return ret;
>> +	ret = intel_free_stream(sdw, substream, dai, sdw->instance);
>> +	if (ret < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(dai->dev, "intel_free_stream: failed %d", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	sdw_release_stream(dma->stream);
> 
> I think, free the 'name' here would be apt

Right, this is something we discussed with Rander shortly before Chinese 
New Year and we wanted to handle this with a follow-up patch, would that 
work for you? if not I can send a v3, your choice.

Thanks
-Pierre

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ