[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8219635-30be-9695-a3f5-cd649aa6fab7@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:37:05 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] soundwire: intel: free all resources
on hw_free()
Hi Vinod,
>> +static int intel_free_stream(struct sdw_intel *sdw,
>> + struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
>> + int link_id)
>> +{
>> + struct sdw_intel_link_res *res = sdw->link_res;
>> + struct sdw_intel_stream_free_data free_data;
>
> where is this struct sdw_intel_stream_free_data defined. I dont see it
> in this patch or this series..
the definition is already upstream :-)
It was added in December with
4b206d34b92224 ('soundwire: intel: update stream callbacks for
hwparams/free stream operations')
>> - return ret;
>> + ret = intel_free_stream(sdw, substream, dai, sdw->instance);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dai->dev, "intel_free_stream: failed %d", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sdw_release_stream(dma->stream);
>
> I think, free the 'name' here would be apt
Right, this is something we discussed with Rander shortly before Chinese
New Year and we wanted to handle this with a follow-up patch, would that
work for you? if not I can send a v3, your choice.
Thanks
-Pierre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists