[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200213165649.GG4333@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:56:49 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mcgrof@...nel.org,
alex.williamson@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/5] rbtree: optimize frequent tree walks
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:55:20AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Mark Brown wrote:
> > As I said in reply to the regmap patch I'm really unconvinced that any
> > benefit will outweigh the increased memory costs for that usage.
> I'm not arguing the regmap case; if it's not worth it it's not worth it.
> With that conversion I was merely hoping that sync was used enough for
> it to be considered.
Well, it's used a fair amount but like I say it's mainly used in the
context of working out what I2C or SPI I/O to do so the amount of CPU
time consumed is neither here nor there really, we'd have to be doing
spectacularly badly for it to register.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists