[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200213190156.GA22854@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:01:57 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] Enable per-file/directory DAX operations V3
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:15:47AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >> Hi, Ira,
> >>
> >> Could you please include documentation patches as part of this series?
> >
> > I do have an update to the vfs.rst doc in
> >
> > fs: Add locking for a dynamic DAX state
> >
> > I'm happy to do more but was there something specific you would like to see?
> > Or documentation in xfs perhaps?
>
> Sorry, I was referring to your statx man page addition.
Ah yea I guess I could include that as a patch. I just wanted to get buy off
on the whole thing prior to setting documentation in.
> It would be
> nice if we could find a home for the information in your cover letter,
> too. Right now, I'm not sure how application developers are supposed to
> figure out how to use the per-inode settings.
I'm not sure either. But this is probably a good start:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
Something under the Usage section like:
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
index 679729442fd2..1bab5d5d775b 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/dax.txt
@@ -20,8 +20,18 @@ Usage
If you have a block device which supports DAX, you can make a filesystem
on it as usual. The DAX code currently only supports files with a block
size equal to your kernel's PAGE_SIZE, so you may need to specify a block
-size when creating the filesystem. When mounting it, use the "-o dax"
-option on the command line or add 'dax' to the options in /etc/fstab.
+size when creating the filesystem.
+
+Files can then be enabled to use dax using the statx system call or an
+application using it like 'xfs_io'. Directories can also be enabled for dax
+to have the file system automatically enable dax on all files within those
+directories.
+
+Alternately, when mounting it one can use the "-o dax" option on the command
+line or add 'dax' to the options in /etc/fstab to globaly override all files to
+use dax on that filesystem. Using the "-o dax" does not change the state of
+individual files so remounting without "-o dax" will revert them to the state
+saved in the filesystem meta data.
Implementation Tips for Block Driver Writers
>
> If I read your cover letter correctly, the mount option overrides any
> on-disk setting. Is that right?
Yes
> Given that we document the dax mount
> option as "the way to get dax," it may be a good idea to allow for a
> user to selectively disable dax, even when -o dax is specified. Is that
> possible?
Not with this patch set. And I'm not sure how that would work. The idea was
that -o dax was simply an override for users who were used to having their
entire FS be dax. We wanted to depreciate the use of "-o dax" in general. The
individual settings are saved so I don't think it makes sense to ignore the -o
dax in favor of those settings. Basically that would IMO make the -o dax
useless.
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists