[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200213195725.GH50449@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:57:25 -0800
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita@...eaurora.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vgarodia@...eaurora.org,
Odelu Kukatla <okukatla@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] Enable video on sc7180
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 13 Feb 10:53 PST 2020, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:02:40AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Tue 14 Jan 04:53 PST 2020, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Changes since v3:
> > > >
> > > > - addressed DT and DT schema review comments.
> > > >
> > > > - renamed DT schema file.
> > > >
> > > > v3 can be found at [1].
> > > > These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6].
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dikshita
> > > >
> > >
> > > Picked up the dts patches for 5.7, with Stan's acks
> >
> > I can't seem to find the patches in the QCOM repo, neither in
> > 'arm64-for-5.7' nor 'for-next'. Am I looking at the wrong place or
> > maybe you forget to push these?
> >
>
> Thanks for the question Matthias, I was looking for this email as I
> rebased onto v5.6-rc1 earlier this week, but got distracted.
>
> I pulled them in, but in the rebase I realized that we don't have the
> interconnects in place, so in it's current form these patches doesn't
> compile.
>
> Seems we're waiting for rather trivial respin of
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1577782737-32068-1-git-send-email-okukatla@codeaurora.org/
> to get this settled.
Hm, there has been no response to the comments in more than a month, also
the series depends on another ('Split SDM845 interconnect nodes and
consolidate RPMh support' https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=238831),
even though that isn't mentioned anywhere.
IIUC the interconnect configuration isn't strictly required to get the
video codec to work. I wonder if it would make sense to respin this
series to remove the interconnect properties. They could be added in a
separate patch after the ICC support has landed.
Dikshita/Bjorn, what do you think?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists