[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200213214525.183689-4-andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:45:24 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, krisman@...labora.com, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
ryao@...too.org, peterz@...radead.org, dvhart@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, z.figura12@...il.com, steven@...vesoftware.com,
pgriffais@...vesoftware.com, steven@...uorix.net,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] selftests: futex: Add FUTEX_WAIT_MULTIPLE wouldblock test
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Add test for wouldblock return when waiting for multiple futexes. Skip
the test if it's a x32 application and the kernel returned the approtiaded
error, since this ABI is not supported for this operation.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Co-developed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
---
Changes since v2: none
---
.../futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c
index 0ae390ff8164..bcbac042992d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
*
* HISTORY
* 2009-Nov-14: Initial version by Gowrishankar <gowrishankar.m@...ibm.com>
+ * 2019-Dec-13: Add WAIT_MULTIPLE test by Krisman <krisman@...labora.com>
*
*****************************************************************************/
@@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct timespec to = {.tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = timeout_ns};
futex_t f1 = FUTEX_INITIALIZER;
+ struct futex_wait_block fwb = {&f1, f1+1, 0};
int res, ret = RET_PASS;
int c;
@@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
}
ksft_print_header();
- ksft_set_plan(1);
+ ksft_set_plan(2);
ksft_print_msg("%s: Test the unexpected futex value in FUTEX_WAIT\n",
basename(argv[0]));
@@ -71,8 +73,30 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
fail("futex_wait returned: %d %s\n",
res ? errno : res, res ? strerror(errno) : "");
ret = RET_FAIL;
+ } else
+ ksft_test_result_pass("futex_wait wouldblock succeeds\n");
+
+ info("Calling futex_wait_multiple on f1: %u @ %p with val=%u\n",
+ f1, &f1, f1+1);
+ res = futex_wait_multiple(&fwb, 1, NULL, FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG);
+
+#ifdef __ILP32__
+ if (res != -1 || errno != ENOSYS) {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("futex_wait_multiple returned %d\n",
+ res < 0 ? errno : res);
+ ret = RET_FAIL;
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("futex_wait_multiple not supported at x32\n");
+ }
+#else
+ if (!res || errno != EWOULDBLOCK) {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("futex_wait_multiple returned %d\n",
+ res < 0 ? errno : res);
+ ret = RET_FAIL;
}
+ ksft_test_result_pass("futex_wait_multiple wouldblock succeeds\n");
+#endif /* __ILP32__ */
- print_result(TEST_NAME, ret);
+ ksft_print_cnts();
return ret;
}
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists