linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] tracing: Make sure synth_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <894c4e955558b521210ee0642ba194a9e603354c.1581630377.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:16:43 -0600
From:   Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To:     rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:     artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] tracing: Make sure synth_event_trace() example always uses u64

synth_event_trace() is the varargs version of synth_event_trace_array(),
which takes an array of u64, as do synth_event_add_val() et al.

To not only be consistent with those, but also to address the fact
that synth_event_trace() expects every arg to be of the same type
since it doesn't also pass in e.g. a format string, the caller needs
to make sure all args are of the same type, u64.  u64 is used because
it needs to accomodate the largest type available in synthetic events,
which is u64.

This fixes the bug reported by the kernel test robot/Rong Chen as
reported here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200212113444.GS12867@shao2-debian/

Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c b/kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c
index 4aefe003cb7c..6866280a9b10 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c
@@ -111,11 +111,11 @@ static int __init test_gen_synth_cmd(void)
 	/* Create some bogus values just for testing */
 
 	vals[0] = 777;			/* next_pid_field */
-	vals[1] = (u64)"hula hoops";	/* next_comm_field */
+	vals[1] = (u64)(long)"hula hoops";	/* next_comm_field */
 	vals[2] = 1000000;		/* ts_ns */
 	vals[3] = 1000;			/* ts_ms */
 	vals[4] = smp_processor_id();	/* cpu */
-	vals[5] = (u64)"thneed";	/* my_string_field */
+	vals[5] = (u64)(long)"thneed";	/* my_string_field */
 	vals[6] = 598;			/* my_int_field */
 
 	/* Now generate a gen_synth_test event */
@@ -218,11 +218,11 @@ static int __init test_empty_synth_event(void)
 	/* Create some bogus values just for testing */
 
 	vals[0] = 777;			/* next_pid_field */
-	vals[1] = (u64)"tiddlywinks";	/* next_comm_field */
+	vals[1] = (u64)(long)"tiddlywinks";	/* next_comm_field */
 	vals[2] = 1000000;		/* ts_ns */
 	vals[3] = 1000;			/* ts_ms */
 	vals[4] = smp_processor_id();	/* cpu */
-	vals[5] = (u64)"thneed_2.0";	/* my_string_field */
+	vals[5] = (u64)(long)"thneed_2.0";	/* my_string_field */
 	vals[6] = 399;			/* my_int_field */
 
 	/* Now trace an empty_synth_test event */
@@ -290,11 +290,11 @@ static int __init test_create_synth_event(void)
 	/* Create some bogus values just for testing */
 
 	vals[0] = 777;			/* next_pid_field */
-	vals[1] = (u64)"tiddlywinks";	/* next_comm_field */
+	vals[1] = (u64)(long)"tiddlywinks";	/* next_comm_field */
 	vals[2] = 1000000;		/* ts_ns */
 	vals[3] = 1000;			/* ts_ms */
 	vals[4] = smp_processor_id();	/* cpu */
-	vals[5] = (u64)"thneed";	/* my_string_field */
+	vals[5] = (u64)(long)"thneed";	/* my_string_field */
 	vals[6] = 398;			/* my_int_field */
 
 	/* Now generate a create_synth_test event */
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int __init test_add_next_synth_val(void)
 		goto out;
 
 	/* next_comm_field */
-	ret = synth_event_add_next_val((u64)"slinky", &trace_state);
+	ret = synth_event_add_next_val((u64)(long)"slinky", &trace_state);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int __init test_add_next_synth_val(void)
 		goto out;
 
 	/* my_string_field */
-	ret = synth_event_add_next_val((u64)"thneed_2.01", &trace_state);
+	ret = synth_event_add_next_val((u64)(long)"thneed_2.01", &trace_state);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -396,12 +396,12 @@ static int __init test_add_synth_val(void)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = synth_event_add_val("next_comm_field", (u64)"silly putty",
+	ret = synth_event_add_val("next_comm_field", (u64)(long)"silly putty",
 				  &trace_state);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = synth_event_add_val("my_string_field", (u64)"thneed_9",
+	ret = synth_event_add_val("my_string_field", (u64)(long)"thneed_9",
 				  &trace_state);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
@@ -423,13 +423,13 @@ static int __init test_trace_synth_event(void)
 
 	/* Trace some bogus values just for testing */
 	ret = synth_event_trace(create_synth_test, 7,	/* number of values */
-				444,			/* next_pid_field */
-				(u64)"clackers",	/* next_comm_field */
-				1000000,		/* ts_ns */
-				1000,			/* ts_ms */
-				smp_processor_id(),	/* cpu */
-				(u64)"Thneed",		/* my_string_field */
-				999);			/* my_int_field */
+				(u64)444,		/* next_pid_field */
+				(u64)(long)"clackers",	/* next_comm_field */
+				(u64)1000000,		/* ts_ns */
+				(u64)1000,		/* ts_ms */
+				(u64)smp_processor_id(),/* cpu */
+				(u64)(long)"Thneed",	/* my_string_field */
+				(u64)999);		/* my_int_field */
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.14.1