linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/11] sched/numa: Bias swapping tasks based on their preferred node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200213111802.GW3466@techsingularity.net>
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:18:02 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] sched/numa: Bias swapping tasks based on their
 preferred node

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:31:08AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 09:36:51AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > When swapping tasks for NUMA balancing, it is preferred that tasks move
> > to or remain on their preferred node. When considering an imbalance,
> > encourage tasks to move to their preferred node and discourage tasks from
> > moving away from their preferred node.
> 
> Wasn't there an issue for workloads that span multiple nodes?
> 

Sortof, yes -- specifically workloads that could not fit inside a node
for whatever reason.

> Say a 4 node system with 2 warehouses? Then each JVM will want 2 nodes,
> instead of a single node, and strong preferred node stuff makes it
> difficult to achieve this.
> 
> I forgot how we dealt with these cases, just something I worry about
> when reading this.

We deal with it in task_numa_migrate() by considering nodes other
than the preferred node for placement -- see "Look at other nodes in
these cases" followed by a sched_setnuma if the preferred node doesn't
match.

We do not do any special casing as such in task_numa_compare other than
finding the best improvement so we can pick a task belonging to a group
spanning multiple nodes with or without this patch. A workload spanning
multiple nodes in itself does not justify a full search if it can be
avoided.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs