linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/mm: Introduce CONFIG_KEEP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <877e0q3f68.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:22:23 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, mingo@...hat.com
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
        hch@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/mm: Introduce CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA

Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> writes:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA
> +#define __initdata_numa
> +#else
> +#define __initdata_numa __initdata
> +#endif

TBH, I find this conditional annotation mightingly confusing.

__initdata_numa still suggest that this is __initdata, just a different
section and some extra rules or whatever.

Something like __initdata_or_keepnuma (sorry I could not come up with
something prettier, but you get the idea.

Thanks,

        tglx