[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b63a4a47-99e5-9c71-73be-740aedde4714@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:59:56 +0000
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, sudeep.holla@....com, lukasz.luba@....com,
rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] cpufreq: add function to get the hardware max
frequency
On 2/11/20 6:45 PM, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> +/**
> + * cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq - get the max hardware frequency of the CPU
> + * @cpu: CPU number
> + *
> + * The default return value is the max_freq field of cpuinfo.
> + */
> +__weak unsigned int cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> + unsigned int ret_freq = 0;
> +
> + if (policy) {
> + ret_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
What about intel_pstate / turbo stuff? IIRC one of Giovanni's issues was that
turbo freq is not always reported as the max freq. Dunno if we can do
anything about it; at the very least maybe document the caveat?
> + }
> +
> + return ret_freq;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq);
> +
> static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy)))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists