linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] printk: Declare log

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:02:14 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] printk: Declare log_wait as external variable

On (20/02/12 15:24), John Ogness wrote:
> On 2020-02-12, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
[..]
> >> I can take a look at dev_ksmg.c/proc_kmsg.c option, unless
> >> someone else wants to spend their time on this.
> >
> > It would be lovely from my POV. I am only concerned about
> > the lockless printk() stuff. I would prefer to avoid creating
> > too many conflicts in the same merge window. Well, I am
> > not sure how many conflicts there would be. Adding John
> > into CC.
>
> I would also love to see these changes. But can we _please_ focus on the
> lockless printk ringbuffer merge first?

Agreed.

> The patches already exist and are (hopefully) being reviewed.
				^^^
				are (hopefully) being tested.

	-ss