[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200213134128.GV4271@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:41:28 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
tiwei.bie@...el.com, maxime.coquelin@...hat.com,
cunming.liang@...el.com, zhihong.wang@...el.com,
rob.miller@...adcom.com, xiao.w.wang@...el.com,
haotian.wang@...ive.com, lingshan.zhu@...el.com,
eperezma@...hat.com, lulu@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, stefanha@...hat.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
hch@...radead.org, aadam@...hat.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
shahafs@...lanox.com, hanand@...inx.com, mhabets@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:34:10AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > You have dev, type or
> > class to choose from. Type is rarely used and doesn't seem to be used
> > by vdpa, so class seems the right choice
> >
> > Jason
>
> Yes, but my understanding is class and bus are mutually exclusive. So we
> can't add a class to a device which is already attached on a bus.
While I suppose there are variations, typically 'class' devices are
user facing things and 'bus' devices are internal facing (ie like a
PCI device)
So why is this using a bus? VDPA is a user facing object, so the
driver should create a class vhost_vdpa device directly, and that
driver should live in the drivers/vhost/ directory.
For the PCI VF case this driver would bind to a PCI device like
everything else
For our future SF/ADI cases the driver would bind to some
SF/ADI/whatever device on a bus.
I don't see a reason for VDPA to be creating busses..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists