[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200213134655.GX3466@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:46:55 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Parth Shah <parth@...ux.ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] sched/numa: replace runnable_load_avg by load_avg
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 09:16:58PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > - load = task_h_load(env->p);
> > - dst_load = env->dst_stats.load + load;
> > - src_load = env->src_stats.load - load;
> > -
> > /*
> > - * If the improvement from just moving env->p direction is better
> > - * than swapping tasks around, check if a move is possible.
> > + * If dst node has spare capacity, then check if there is an
> > + * imbalance that would be overruled by the load balancer.
> > */
> > - maymove = !load_too_imbalanced(src_load, dst_load, env);
> > + if (env->dst_stats.node_type == node_has_spare) {
> > + unsigned int imbalance;
> > + int src_running, dst_running;
> > +
> > + /* Would movement cause an imbalance? */
> > + src_running = env->src_stats.nr_running - 1;
> > + dst_running = env->src_stats.nr_running + 1;
> > + imbalance = max(0, dst_running - src_running);
>
> Have trouble working out why 2 is magician again to make your test data nicer :P
>
This is calculating what the nr_running would be after the move and
checking if an imbalance exists after the move forcing the load balancer
to intervene.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists