linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 22/96] bpf, sockmap: Dont sleep while holding RCU lock on tear-down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200213151847.788857297@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:20:29 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 22/96] bpf, sockmap: Dont sleep while holding RCU lock on tear-down

From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>

commit db6a5018b6e008c1d69c6628cdaa9541b8e70940 upstream.

rcu_read_lock is needed to protect access to psock inside sock_map_unref
when tearing down the map. However, we can't afford to sleep in lock_sock
while in RCU read-side critical section. Grab the RCU lock only after we
have locked the socket.

This fixes RCU warnings triggerable on a VM with 1 vCPU when free'ing a
sockmap/sockhash that contains at least one socket:

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 #450 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_map_free+0x5/0x170
|  #3: ffff8881368c5df8 (&stab->lock){+...}, at: sock_map_free+0x64/0x170
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 #450
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_map_free+0x95/0x170
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty #452 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_hash_free+0x5/0x1d0
|  #3: ffff888139966e00 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}, at: sock_hash_free+0x92/0x1d0
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty #452
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_hash_free+0xec/0x1d0
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

Fixes: 7e81a3530206 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200206111652.694507-2-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/core/sock_map.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ static void sock_map_free(struct bpf_map
 	int i;
 
 	synchronize_rcu();
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	raw_spin_lock_bh(&stab->lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < stab->map.max_entries; i++) {
 		struct sock **psk = &stab->sks[i];
@@ -243,12 +242,13 @@ static void sock_map_free(struct bpf_map
 		sk = xchg(psk, NULL);
 		if (sk) {
 			lock_sock(sk);
+			rcu_read_lock();
 			sock_map_unref(sk, psk);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			release_sock(sk);
 		}
 	}
 	raw_spin_unlock_bh(&stab->lock);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	synchronize_rcu();
 
@@ -859,19 +859,19 @@ static void sock_hash_free(struct bpf_ma
 	int i;
 
 	synchronize_rcu();
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	for (i = 0; i < htab->buckets_num; i++) {
 		bucket = sock_hash_select_bucket(htab, i);
 		raw_spin_lock_bh(&bucket->lock);
 		hlist_for_each_entry_safe(elem, node, &bucket->head, node) {
 			hlist_del_rcu(&elem->node);
 			lock_sock(elem->sk);
+			rcu_read_lock();
 			sock_map_unref(elem->sk, elem);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			release_sock(elem->sk);
 		}
 		raw_spin_unlock_bh(&bucket->lock);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	bpf_map_area_free(htab->buckets);
 	kfree(htab);