lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:59:34 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sergey Gorenko <sergeygo@...lanox.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 324/459] IB/srp: Never use immediate data if it is disabled by a user

From: Sergey Gorenko <sergeygo@...lanox.com>

[ Upstream commit 0fbb37dd82998b5c83355997b3bdba2806968ac7 ]

Some SRP targets that do not support specification SRP-2, put the garbage
to the reserved bits of the SRP login response.  The problem was not
detected for a long time because the SRP initiator ignored those bits. But
now one of them is used as SRP_LOGIN_RSP_IMMED_SUPP. And it causes a
critical error on the target when the initiator sends immediate data.

The ib_srp module has a use_imm_date parameter to enable or disable
immediate data manually. But it does not help in the above case, because
use_imm_date is ignored at handling the SRP login response. The problem is
definitely caused by a bug on the target side, but the initiator's
behavior also does not look correct.  The initiator should not use
immediate data if use_imm_date is disabled by a user.

This commit adds an additional checking of use_imm_date at the handling of
SRP login response to avoid unexpected use of immediate data.

Fixes: 882981f4a411 ("RDMA/srp: Add support for immediate data")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200115133055.30232-1-sergeygo@mellanox.com
Signed-off-by: Sergey Gorenko <sergeygo@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
index b5960351bec08..8708ed5477e99 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
@@ -2536,7 +2536,8 @@ static void srp_cm_rep_handler(struct ib_cm_id *cm_id,
 	if (lrsp->opcode == SRP_LOGIN_RSP) {
 		ch->max_ti_iu_len = be32_to_cpu(lrsp->max_ti_iu_len);
 		ch->req_lim       = be32_to_cpu(lrsp->req_lim_delta);
-		ch->use_imm_data  = lrsp->rsp_flags & SRP_LOGIN_RSP_IMMED_SUPP;
+		ch->use_imm_data  = srp_use_imm_data &&
+			(lrsp->rsp_flags & SRP_LOGIN_RSP_IMMED_SUPP);
 		ch->max_it_iu_len = srp_max_it_iu_len(target->cmd_sg_cnt,
 						      ch->use_imm_data);
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(ch->max_it_iu_len >
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ