lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:10:32 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 177/252] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use WRITE_ONCE() when changing validity of an STE

From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit d71e01716b3606a6648df7e5646ae12c75babde4 ]

If, for some bizarre reason, the compiler decided to split up the write
of STE DWORD 0, we could end up making a partial structure valid.

Although this probably won't happen, follow the example of the
context-descriptor code and use WRITE_ONCE() to ensure atomicity of the
write.

Reported-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index eff1f3aa5ef43..6b7664052b5be 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1185,7 +1185,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid,
 	}
 
 	arm_smmu_sync_ste_for_sid(smmu, sid);
-	dst[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
+	/* See comment in arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc() */
+	WRITE_ONCE(dst[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
 	arm_smmu_sync_ste_for_sid(smmu, sid);
 
 	/* It's likely that we'll want to use the new STE soon */
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists