[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200214170559.GA64767@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:05:59 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
"Arthur D ." <spinal.by@...il.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...mer.com>,
Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@...zup.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: ti: Allocate dais dynamically for TDM and audio
graph card
* Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> [200214 12:50]:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > On 12/02/2020 16.35, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > > Oops, that's not good. So should we just keep the old naming if there's
> > > only one endpoint?
>
> > That's an option, yes, if we really need extra dummy McBSP DAIs at all,
> > again, let's hear from Morimoto-san or Mark.
>
> We really shouldn't need dummy DAIs at all I think, if we do it feels
> like there's a problem. It's quite possible that there is actually a
> problem here though...
It's dummy in the droid4 voice call case as mcbsp is not the clock-master
and there's nothing to configure for mcbsp.
But I guess in some cases mcbsp could be the clock-master and then the
secondary DAI would have ops.
I could be wrong though, this is just based on my experience with
getting one device working.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists