linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 087/252] padata: always acquire cpu_hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200214161147.15842-87-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:09:02 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 087/252] padata: always acquire cpu_hotplug_lock before pinst->lock

From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit 38228e8848cd7dd86ccb90406af32de0cad24be3 ]

lockdep complains when padata's paths to update cpumasks via CPU hotplug
and sysfs are both taken:

  # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
  # echo ff > /sys/kernel/pcrypt/pencrypt/parallel_cpumask

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.4.0-rc8-padata-cpuhp-v3+ #1 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  bash/205 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffffff8286bcd0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: padata_set_cpumask+0x2b/0x120

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8880001abfa0 (&pinst->lock){+.+.}, at: padata_set_cpumask+0x26/0x120

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

padata doesn't take cpu_hotplug_lock and pinst->lock in a consistent
order.  Which should be first?  CPU hotplug calls into padata with
cpu_hotplug_lock already held, so it should have priority.

Fixes: 6751fb3c0e0c ("padata: Use get_online_cpus/put_online_cpus")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/padata.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/padata.c b/kernel/padata.c
index 11c5f9c8779ea..5e8a2a4398565 100644
--- a/kernel/padata.c
+++ b/kernel/padata.c
@@ -670,8 +670,8 @@ int padata_set_cpumask(struct padata_instance *pinst, int cpumask_type,
 	struct cpumask *serial_mask, *parallel_mask;
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 
-	mutex_lock(&pinst->lock);
 	get_online_cpus();
+	mutex_lock(&pinst->lock);
 
 	switch (cpumask_type) {
 	case PADATA_CPU_PARALLEL:
@@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ int padata_set_cpumask(struct padata_instance *pinst, int cpumask_type,
 	err =  __padata_set_cpumasks(pinst, parallel_mask, serial_mask);
 
 out:
-	put_online_cpus();
 	mutex_unlock(&pinst->lock);
+	put_online_cpus();
 
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.20.1