[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200214160149.11681-369-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:00:19 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 369/459] kbuild: use -S instead of -E for precise cc-option test in Kconfig
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3bed1b7b9d79ca40e41e3af130931a3225e951a3 ]
Currently, -E (stop after the preprocessing stage) is used to check
whether the given compiler flag is supported.
While it is faster than -S (or -c), it can be false-positive. You need
to run the compilation proper to check the flag more precisely.
For example, -E and -S disagree about the support of
"--param asan-instrument-allocas=1".
$ gcc -Werror --param asan-instrument-allocas=1 -E -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null
$ echo $?
0
$ gcc -Werror --param asan-instrument-allocas=1 -S -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null
cc1: error: invalid --param name ‘asan-instrument-allocas’; did you mean ‘asan-instrument-writes’?
$ echo $?
1
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
scripts/Kconfig.include | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
index d4adfbe426903..bfb44b265a948 100644
--- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
+++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ failure = $(if-success,$(1),n,y)
# $(cc-option,<flag>)
# Return y if the compiler supports <flag>, n otherwise
-cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -E -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null)
+cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -S -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null)
# $(ld-option,<flag>)
# Return y if the linker supports <flag>, n otherwise
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists