linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 188/459] fore200e: Fix incorrect checks of NULL pointer dereference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200214160149.11681-188-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:57:18 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 188/459] fore200e: Fix incorrect checks of NULL pointer dereference

From: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>

[ Upstream commit bbd20c939c8aa3f27fa30e86691af250bf92973a ]

In fore200e_send and fore200e_close, the pointers from the arguments
are dereferenced in the variable declaration block and then checked
for NULL. The patch fixes these issues by avoiding NULL pointer
dereferences.

Signed-off-by: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/atm/fore200e.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/atm/fore200e.c b/drivers/atm/fore200e.c
index f1a5002053132..8fbd36eb89410 100644
--- a/drivers/atm/fore200e.c
+++ b/drivers/atm/fore200e.c
@@ -1414,12 +1414,14 @@ fore200e_open(struct atm_vcc *vcc)
 static void
 fore200e_close(struct atm_vcc* vcc)
 {
-    struct fore200e*        fore200e = FORE200E_DEV(vcc->dev);
     struct fore200e_vcc*    fore200e_vcc;
+    struct fore200e*        fore200e;
     struct fore200e_vc_map* vc_map;
     unsigned long           flags;
 
     ASSERT(vcc);
+    fore200e = FORE200E_DEV(vcc->dev);
+
     ASSERT((vcc->vpi >= 0) && (vcc->vpi < 1<<FORE200E_VPI_BITS));
     ASSERT((vcc->vci >= 0) && (vcc->vci < 1<<FORE200E_VCI_BITS));
 
@@ -1464,10 +1466,10 @@ fore200e_close(struct atm_vcc* vcc)
 static int
 fore200e_send(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-    struct fore200e*        fore200e     = FORE200E_DEV(vcc->dev);
-    struct fore200e_vcc*    fore200e_vcc = FORE200E_VCC(vcc);
+    struct fore200e*        fore200e;
+    struct fore200e_vcc*    fore200e_vcc;
     struct fore200e_vc_map* vc_map;
-    struct host_txq*        txq          = &fore200e->host_txq;
+    struct host_txq*        txq;
     struct host_txq_entry*  entry;
     struct tpd*             tpd;
     struct tpd_haddr        tpd_haddr;
@@ -1480,9 +1482,18 @@ fore200e_send(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb)
     unsigned char*          data;
     unsigned long           flags;
 
-    ASSERT(vcc);
-    ASSERT(fore200e);
-    ASSERT(fore200e_vcc);
+    if (!vcc)
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    fore200e = FORE200E_DEV(vcc->dev);
+    fore200e_vcc = FORE200E_VCC(vcc);
+
+    if (!fore200e)
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    txq = &fore200e->host_txq;
+    if (!fore200e_vcc)
+        return -EINVAL;
 
     if (!test_bit(ATM_VF_READY, &vcc->flags)) {
 	DPRINTK(1, "VC %d.%d.%d not ready for tx\n", vcc->itf, vcc->vpi, vcc->vpi);
-- 
2.20.1