[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200214070247.wrh6yaccyqiwlezh@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:02:47 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Cc: "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6sx: Add missing uart mux function
Hello Anson,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 05:11:11AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> > - rename existing imx6sx symbols to contain DTE or DCE
> > (introducing defines that map the old name to the new)
>
> Is the introducing defines that map to old name to the new mainly for
> NOT breaking bisect? As pinfunc.h is changed in a separate patch other than dts files.
It's also for not breaking out-of-tree dts files. I'd put them at the
bottom of the file with a comment that these are not supposed to be used
any more and remove them after a bit of bitrotting there.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists