linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 109/542] rtw88: fix rate mask for 1SS chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200214154854.6746-109-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:41:41 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>,
        Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 109/542] rtw88: fix rate mask for 1SS chip

From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>

[ Upstream commit 35a68fa5f96a80797e11b6952a47c5a84939a7bf ]

The rate mask is used to tell firmware the supported rate depends on
negotiation. We loop 2 times for all VHT/HT 2SS rate mask first, and then
only keep the part according to chip's NSS.

This commit fixes the logic error of '&' operations for VHT/HT rate, and
we should run this logic before adding legacy rate.

To access HT MCS map, index 0/1 represent MCS 0-7/8-15 respectively. Use
NL80211_BAND_xxx is incorrect, so fix it as well.

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
index ae61415e16654..f369ddca953af 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
@@ -706,8 +706,8 @@ void rtw_update_sta_info(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_sta_info *si)
 		if (sta->vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SHORT_GI_80)
 			is_support_sgi = true;
 	} else if (sta->ht_cap.ht_supported) {
-		ra_mask |= (sta->ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ] << 20) |
-			   (sta->ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ] << 12);
+		ra_mask |= (sta->ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[1] << 20) |
+			   (sta->ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask[0] << 12);
 		if (sta->ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_RX_STBC)
 			stbc_en = HT_STBC_EN;
 		if (sta->ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_LDPC_CODING)
@@ -717,6 +717,9 @@ void rtw_update_sta_info(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_sta_info *si)
 			is_support_sgi = true;
 	}
 
+	if (efuse->hw_cap.nss == 1)
+		ra_mask &= RA_MASK_VHT_RATES_1SS | RA_MASK_HT_RATES_1SS;
+
 	if (hal->current_band_type == RTW_BAND_5G) {
 		ra_mask |= (u64)sta->supp_rates[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ] << 4;
 		if (sta->vht_cap.vht_supported) {
@@ -750,11 +753,6 @@ void rtw_update_sta_info(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_sta_info *si)
 		wireless_set = 0;
 	}
 
-	if (efuse->hw_cap.nss == 1) {
-		ra_mask &= RA_MASK_VHT_RATES_1SS;
-		ra_mask &= RA_MASK_HT_RATES_1SS;
-	}
-
 	switch (sta->bandwidth) {
 	case IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80:
 		bw_mode = RTW_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80;
-- 
2.20.1