[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bebb759e-ff1f-e11e-be6f-589c96a338c0@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:32:57 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: luanshi <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V2 2/3] firmware: arm_sdei: Removed multiple white lines.
Hi Luanshi,
On 16/01/2020 03:28, luanshi wrote:
> Remove one unnecessary white line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> index 37e9bf0..f81c09e 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> @@ -599,7 +599,6 @@ static int _sdei_event_register(struct sdei_event *event)
> event->registered,
> SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY, 0);
>
> -
> err = sdei_do_cross_call(_local_event_register, event);
> if (err) {
> spin_lock(&event->sdei_event_lock);
I'm afraid these whitespace-only patches aren't worth sending. If its not caught at
review, it gets to annoy the reader until someone can do a drive-by fix when they are
changing adjacent code.
I've merged this with the first patch in the eventual series.
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists