linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mce/amd: Fix kobject lifetime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200214201143.GQ13395@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:43 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce/amd: Fix kobject lifetime

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:17:27AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Does not bother me at all, it's fine to see stuff come by that will end
> up in future trees, it's not noise at all.  So no need to suppress
> stable@...r if you don't want to.

Ok, but what about your formletter which you send to people explaining
this is not how you should send a patch to stable?

Like this, for example:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200116100925.GA157179@kroah.com

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette