| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200214213231.GA6583@kedthinkpad>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:32:31 +0200
From: Andrey Lebedev <andrey.lebedev@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: wens@...e.org, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Andrey Lebedev <andrey@...edev.lt>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: sun7i: dts: Add LVDS panel support on A20
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 09:53:51AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:43:58AM +0200, Andrey Lebedev wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:52:18AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > > This will create a spurious warning message for TCON1, since we
> > > > > adjusted the driver to tell it supports LVDS, but there's no LVDS
> > > > > reset line, so we need to make it finer grained.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I can attribute two of the messages in my dmesg log [1] to this
> > > > ("Missing LVDS properties" and "LVDS output disabled". "sun4i-tcon
> > > > 1c0d000.lcd-controller" is indeed tcon1). And yes, I can see how they
> > > > can be confusing to someone.
> > > >
> > > > I'd need some pointers on how to deal with that though (if we want to do
> > > > it in this scope).
> > >
> > > Like I was mentionning, you could introduce a new compatible for each
> > > TCON (tcon0 and tcon1) and only set the support_lvds flag for tcon0
> >
> > Can you give me an idea how that compatible might look like?
> >
> > tcon0: lcd-controller@...c000 {
> > compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon", "allwinner,lvds";
> >
> > or
> >
> > tcon0: lcd-controller@...c000 {
> > compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon", "allwinner,tcon0";
> >
> > ? Or something completely different?
>
> Something like
>
> &tcon0 {
> compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon0", "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon";
> };
>
> &tcon1 {
> compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon1", "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon";
> };
>
Hi Maxime, here is what I came up with, please take a look. If the
approach is right, I'll split it up and include into the patch set.
>From f3e45c958a9551a52ac26435785bdb572e54d8db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrey Lebedev <andrey@...edev.lt>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:21:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Mark tcon0 to be the only tcon capable of LVDS on sun7i-a20
This allows to avoid warnings about reset line not provided for tcon1.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Lebedev <andrey@...edev.lt>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
index 3b3c366a2bee..bab59fc4d9b1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@
};
tcon0: lcd-controller@...c000 {
- compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon";
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon0", "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon";
reg = <0x01c0c000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 44 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
resets = <&ccu RST_TCON0>, <&ccu RST_LVDS>;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
index 800a9bd86112..cb2040aec436 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
@@ -1107,6 +1107,25 @@ static struct sunxi_engine *sun4i_tcon_find_engine(struct sun4i_drv *drv,
return sun4i_tcon_find_engine_traverse(drv, node, 0);
}
+/*
+ * Check if given tcon supports LVDS
+ *
+ * Some of the sunxi SoC variants contain several timing controllers, but only
+ * one of them can be used to drive LVDS screen. In this case such tcon is
+ * identified in respective quirks struct: lvds_compatible_tcon property will
+ * hold "compatible" string of the tcon, that supports LVDS.
+ *
+ * If lvds_compatible_tcon is not set, all tcons are considered capable of
+ * driving LVDS.
+ */
+static bool sun4i_tcon_lvds_compat(struct device *dev, struct sun4i_tcon *tcon)
+{
+ if (tcon->quirks->lvds_compatible_tcon == NULL)
+ return true;
+ return of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node,
+ tcon->quirks->lvds_compatible_tcon);
+}
+
static int sun4i_tcon_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
void *data)
{
@@ -1161,7 +1180,7 @@ static int sun4i_tcon_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
return ret;
}
- if (tcon->quirks->supports_lvds) {
+ if (tcon->quirks->supports_lvds && sun4i_tcon_lvds_compat(dev, tcon)) {
/*
* This can only be made optional since we've had DT
* nodes without the LVDS reset properties.
@@ -1481,6 +1500,7 @@ static const struct sun4i_tcon_quirks sun6i_a31s_quirks = {
static const struct sun4i_tcon_quirks sun7i_a20_quirks = {
.supports_lvds = true,
+ .lvds_compatible_tcon = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-tcon0",
.has_channel_0 = true,
.has_channel_1 = true,
.dclk_min_div = 4,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
index cfbf4e6c1679..bc87d28ee341 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h
@@ -235,6 +235,8 @@ struct sun4i_tcon_quirks {
bool needs_de_be_mux; /* sun6i needs mux to select backend */
bool needs_edp_reset; /* a80 edp reset needed for tcon0 access */
bool supports_lvds; /* Does the TCON support an LVDS output? */
+ /* "compatible" string of TCON that exclusively supports LVDS */
+ const char *lvds_compatible_tcon;
u8 dclk_min_div; /* minimum divider for TCON0 DCLK */
/* callback to handle tcon muxing options */
--
2.20.1
--
Andrey Lebedev aka -.- . -.. -.. . .-.
Software engineer
Homepage: http://lebedev.lt/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists