[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200214235607.13749-6-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:55:43 -0800
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/30] rcu: Add WRITE_ONCE to rcu_node ->exp_seq_rq store
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
The rcu_node structure's ->exp_seq_rq field is read locklessly, so
this commit adds the WRITE_ONCE() to a load in order to provide proper
documentation and READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() pairing.
This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index d7e0484..85b009e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static bool exp_funnel_lock(unsigned long s)
sync_exp_work_done(s));
return true;
}
- rnp->exp_seq_rq = s; /* Followers can wait on us. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_rq, s); /* Followers can wait on us. */
spin_unlock(&rnp->exp_lock);
trace_rcu_exp_funnel_lock(rcu_state.name, rnp->level,
rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, TPS("nxtlvl"));
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists