linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 0/5] Add minimal boot support for IPQ6018

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ1G-Rks+-JrY-bN6A1YpQGqRBoDKS5kYn9BfdWqYjXSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:19:55 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, sivaprak@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/5] Add minimal boot support for IPQ6018

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 2:13 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org> wrote:

> The IPQ6018 is Qualcomm\u2019s 802.11ax SoC for Routers,
> Gateways and Access Points.
>
> This series adds minimal board boot support for ipq6018-cp01 board.
>
> [V6]
>  * Addressed more review comments on pinctrl bindings from Rob.
>  * Patch 4 arm64: dts: Add ipq6018 SoC and CP01 board support has build
>    dependency with,
>         https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/9/84

I have applied patches 1 & 2 and the remaining patches can be
applied to the ARM SoC-relavent tree (Bjorn can handle this I think?)

I am sorry it didn't make it into v5.6, this is caused by the bottleneck
for YAML schema review, we would appreciate more people
participating in writing and reviewing new schemas, we are currently
in a bit of learning phase.

Yours,
Linus Walleij