[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24e6ac71-00c7-f140-86d8-fa5ec0dcaff0@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:28:44 +0530
From: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: Update Output tap
delay binding
Rob,
On 07/02/20 3:07 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Rob,
>
> On 20/01/20 11:00 am, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 15/01/20 7:20 am, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 08:39:18PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>> According to latest AM65x Data Manual[1], a different output tap delay
>>>> value is recommended for all speed modes. Therefore, replace the
>>>> ti,otap-del-sel binding with one ti,otap-del-sel- for each MMC/SD speed
>>>> mode.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/am6526
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.txt | 21 +++++++++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.txt
>>>> index 50e87df47971..c6ccecb9ae5a 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.txt
>>>> @@ -18,7 +18,20 @@ Required Properties:
>>>> - clocks: Handles to the clock inputs.
>>>> - clock-names: Tuple including "clk_xin" and "clk_ahb"
>>>> - interrupts: Interrupt specifiers
>>>> - - ti,otap-del-sel: Output Tap Delay select
>>>> + Output tap delay for each speed mode:
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-legacy
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-mmc-hs
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-sd-hs
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-sdr12
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-sdr25
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-sdr50
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-sdr104
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-ddr50
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-ddr52
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-hs200
>>>> + - ti,otap-del-sel-hs400
>>>> + These bindings must be provided otherwise the driver will disable the
>>>> + corresponding speed mode (i.e. all nodes must provide at least -legacy)
>>>
>>> Why not just extend the existing property to be an array. We already
>>> have properties to enable/disable speed modes.
>>>
>>
>> Its hard to keep track of which modes have values and which don't when
>> you add an array. This scheme is just easier on anyone adding new values
>> or updating old values.
>>
>> We already disable speed modes based on platform specific properties in
>> other drivers. In sdhci-omap.c, the driver disables the corresponding
>> speed mode if the corresponding pinmux and iodelay values are not populated.
>>
>
> Do you agree on above?
>
Gentle ping.
Thanks,
Faiz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists