[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200215002520.15746-2-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:25:19 -0800
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Add missing annotation for exit_tasks_rcu_start()
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
Sparse reports a warning at exit_tasks_rcu_start(void)
|warning: context imbalance in exit_tasks_rcu_start() - wrong count at exit
To fix this, this commit adds an __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu).
Given that exit_tasks_rcu_start() does actually call __srcu_read_lock(),
this not only fixes the warning but also improves on the readability of
the code.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/update.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index a27df76..a04fe54 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread(void)
core_initcall(rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread);
/* Do the srcu_read_lock() for the above synchronize_srcu(). */
-void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void)
+void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
{
preempt_disable();
current->rcu_tasks_idx = __srcu_read_lock(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu);
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists