linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 00/19] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200215120917.2c21e31f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:09:17 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 00/19] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT_RT co-exist

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:39:17 +0100 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>    1) All interrupts, which are not explicitely marked IRQF_NO_THREAD, are

nit: s/explicitely/explicitly/ throughout (incl. code comments)