[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2002161158140.30459-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 12:01:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>, <mingo@...nel.org>, <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
<npiggin@...il.com>, <dhowells@...hat.com>, <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
<luc.maranget@...ia.fr>, <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memory-model] Add recent references
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This commit updates the list of LKMM-related publications in
> Documentation/references.txt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> o Paul E. McKenney, Ulrich Weigand, Andrea Parri, and Boqun
> - Feng. 2016. "Linux-Kernel Memory Model". (6 June 2016).
> - http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2016/p0124r2.html.
> + Feng. 2018. "Linux-Kernel Memory Model". (27 September 2018).
> + http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0124r6.html.
Even though this is an update, the new version referenced here is
already out-of-date (in particular, with regard to its discussions of
the ordering properties of unlock-lock sequences as viewed by threads
not holding the lock). And it contains a few typos scattered
throughout.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists