[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <FF9BD3B9-7D78-4470-89CD-6F6831F4B6A6@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 09:05:02 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: Fix unused label warning
> Am 16.02.2020 um 08:46 schrieb Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:33:28AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>>
>> Fix
>>
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c: In function ‘virtballoon_probe’:
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c:963:1: warning: label ‘out_del_vqs’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
>> 963 | out_del_vqs:
>> | ^~
>>
>> The CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION ifdeffery should enclose it too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> index 7bfe365d9372..b6ed5f8bccb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> @@ -959,9 +959,9 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> iput(vb->vb_dev_info.inode);
>> out_kern_unmount:
>> kern_unmount(balloon_mnt);
>> -#endif
>> out_del_vqs:
>> vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
>> +#endif
>
> I noticed the same issue and sent an almost identical patch [1] but I
> kept the call to del_vqs outside of the CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION guard
> since it seems like that should still be called when that config is
> unset, as that was the case before commit 1ad6f58ea936 ("virtio_balloon:
> Fix memory leaks on errors in virtballoon_probe()"). Is this patch fully
> correct? I am not a virtio expert at all, just noticing from a brief
> reading of this function.
I think you are right and this splipped my eyes!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists