linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: add burst to cgroup cpu bandwidth controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC=E7cUgALi4g19GsDZQemHafQfaSpjY1XUo3Swrv_g1PaWejQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:56:29 -0600
From:   Dave Chiluk <chiluk+linux@...eed.com>
To:     Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc:     Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: add burst to cgroup cpu bandwidth controller

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:55 PM <bsegall@...gle.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure that starting with full burst runtime is best, though it
> definitely seems likely to be one of those things where sometimes it's
> what you want and sometimes it's not.

We (Indeed) definitely want to start with a full burst bank in most
cases, as this would help with slow/throttled start-up times for our
Jitted and interpreter-based language applications.  I agree that it
would be nice to have it be configurable.

Dave.
fyi.  Unfortunately, this e-mail may be temporarily turned off for the
next few weeks, I apologize in advance for any bounced messages to me.