lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:56:29 -0600
From:   Dave Chiluk <>
To:     Ben Segall <>
Cc:     Konstantin Khlebnikov <>,
        Peter Zijlstra <>,,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Juri Lelli <>,
        Vincent Guittot <>,
        Steven Rostedt <>,
        Ingo Molnar <>, Mel Gorman <>,
        Cong Wang <>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: add burst to cgroup cpu bandwidth controller

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:55 PM <> wrote:
> I'm not sure that starting with full burst runtime is best, though it
> definitely seems likely to be one of those things where sometimes it's
> what you want and sometimes it's not.

We (Indeed) definitely want to start with a full burst bank in most
cases, as this would help with slow/throttled start-up times for our
Jitted and interpreter-based language applications.  I agree that it
would be nice to have it be configurable.

fyi.  Unfortunately, this e-mail may be temporarily turned off for the
next few weeks, I apologize in advance for any bounced messages to me.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists