linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835_defconfig: add minimal support for Raspberry Pi4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 21:18:34 +0100
From:   Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835_defconfig: add minimal support for
 Raspberry Pi4

[ Adding Florian to the coversation ]

On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 13:22 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> On 14.02.2020 16:14, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > IMO bcm2711_defconfig if the last resort solution. I don't think you can
> > do bcm2835_lpae_defconfig as RPi and RPi2 SoCs don't support LPAE.
> 
> Okay, if you want I can send a patch adding bcm2711_defconfig.
> 
> > An intemediate solution is being discussed here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/694
> 
> Right, I also agree that multi_v7_lpae_defconfig is needed. Best would 
> be to have both (bcm2711 for quick tests of board-dedicated kernel and 
> multi for distributions).

So I understand you'd be creating a new bcm2711_defconfig based on
bcm2835_defconfig plus whatever is needed. Sounds OK to me. It'd be nice to
have a small kernel config to do bisects with.

Any comments Florian, Stefan?

Regards,
Nicolas


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)