[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e09b8921d1aade7b9d2aace43fc357bdcd1001bd.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:32:33 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] powerpc/mm: Adds arch-specificic functions to
track lockless pgtable walks
On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 01:38 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > Why not make them static inline just like the generic ones ?
> >
>
> Sure, can be done. It would save some function calls.
> For that I will define the per-cpu variable in .c and declare it in .h
> All new function can be moved to .h, while changing adding the inline
> modifier.
Just tried doing that, but percpu stuff relies in paca definitions, and
this ends up creating some cyclic dependencies.
I could try to change that, but the amount of change is big and
probably should be dealt in another patchset.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists