[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200217145313.74ded08a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:53:13 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB ifdefs
Hi all,
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:56:57 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/14/20 5:17 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 2/14/20 1:00 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:46 PM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Fixes an #ifdef bug in the patch referred to below that was
> >>> causing a build error when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM &&
> >>> !CONFIG_CCGROUP_HUGETLB.
> >
> > Hi Mina,
> >
> > I don't know if this was supposed to fix the 2 build reports that I made,
> > but this does not apply cleanly to mmotm (and it's a reply email so it's
> > more difficult to apply anyway):
> >
> > Applying patch mm-hugetlb-fix-CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB.patch
> > patching file mm/hugetlb.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 289 with fuzz 1.
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 325 with fuzz 2.
> > Hunk #3 FAILED at 435.
> > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file mm/hugetlb.c
> >
>
> OK, I applied this patch manually and it does fix most of the reported build problems.
I have also applied that patch by had to linux-next today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists