lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 23:34:15 +0000 From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com> To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/rt: cpupri_find: implement fallback mechanism for !fit case On 02/17/20 17:07, Valentin Schneider wrote: > Just a drive-by comment; could you split that code move into its own patch? > It'd make the history a bit easier to read IMO. Hmm I don't see how it would help the history. In large series with big churn splitting helps to facilitate review, but I don't think reviewing this patch is hard because of creating the new function. And git-blame will have this patch all over the new function, so people who care to know the reason of the split will land at the right place directly without any extra level of indirection. Thanks -- Qais Yousef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists