linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the csky tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200217122242.2da61737@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 12:22:42 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        MaJun <majun258@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the csky
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  arch/csky/include/asm/Kbuild

between commit:

  aeb58bb21421 ("csky: Add PCI support")

from the csky tree and commit:

  25e6e2bca62a ("asm-generic: make more kernel-space headers mandatory")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (the latter is a superset of the former) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped