[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CwQ2pCpdts_wao9Qy1EBqhOnO0PQQWX6ZU3brt2oeUTzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:40:19 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: X86: Less kvmclock sync induced vmexits after
VM boots
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 18:36, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
>
> In the progress of vCPUs creation, it queues a kvmclock sync worker to
> the global
> workqueue before each vCPU creation completes. Each worker will be scheduled
> after 300 * HZ delay and request a kvmclock update for all vCPUs and kick them
> out. This is especially worse when scaling to large VMs due to a lot of vmexits.
> Just one worker as a leader to trigger the kvmclock sync request for
> all vCPUs is
> enough.
Sorry for the alignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fb5d64e..d0ba2d4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -9390,8 +9390,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!kvmclock_periodic_sync)
> return;
>
> - schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work,
> - KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD);
> + if (kvm->created_vcpus == 1)
> + schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work,
> + KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD);
> }
>
> void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> --
> 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists