lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 12:02:00 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <>
To:     Boqun Feng <>
Cc:     Alan Stern <>,,
        Andrea Parri <>,
        Will Deacon <>,
        Nicholas Piggin <>,
        David Howells <>,
        Jade Alglave <>,
        Luc Maranget <>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <>,
        Akira Yokosawa <>,
        Daniel Lustig <>,
        Jonathan Corbet <>,,
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] tools/memory-model: Add a litmus test for atomic_set()

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 07:52:15AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> I agree, and thanks for the suggestion! And I change the sentence in
> atomic_t.txt with:
> 	A note for the implementation of atomic_set{}() is that it
> 	cannot break the atomicity of the RMW ops.
> , since I think that part of the doc is more about the suggestion to
> anyone who want to implement the atomic_set(). Peter, is that OK to you?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists