linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/lima: fix recovering from PLBU out of memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKGbVbvPPowjVixjyfBF=z=6y5GDEsV3d-2pzdRWK7pt3ewRew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:06:02 +0800
From:   Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>
To:     Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        lima@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/lima: fix recovering from PLBU out of memory

applied to drm-misc-next.

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:20 AM Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Looks good for me, patch is:
> Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>
>
> Regards,
> Qiang
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:50 AM Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > It looks like on PLBU_OUT_OF_MEM interrupt we need to resume from where we
> > stopped, i.e. new PLBU heap start is old end. Also update end address
> > in GP frame to grow heap on 2nd and subsequent out of memory interrupts.
> >
> > Fixes: 2081e8dcf1ee ("drm/lima: recover task by enlarging heap buffer")
> > Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gp.c | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gp.c
> > index d1e7826c2d74..325604262def 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gp.c
> > @@ -224,8 +224,13 @@ static int lima_gp_task_recover(struct lima_sched_pipe *pipe)
> >         }
> >
> >         gp_write(LIMA_GP_INT_MASK, LIMA_GP_IRQ_MASK_USED);
> > +       /* Resume from where we stopped, i.e. new start is old end */
> > +       gp_write(LIMA_GP_PLBU_ALLOC_START_ADDR,
> > +                f[LIMA_GP_PLBU_ALLOC_END_ADDR >> 2]);
> > +       f[LIMA_GP_PLBU_ALLOC_END_ADDR >> 2] =
> > +               f[LIMA_GP_PLBU_ALLOC_START_ADDR >> 2] + task->heap->heap_size;
> >         gp_write(LIMA_GP_PLBU_ALLOC_END_ADDR,
> > -                f[LIMA_GP_PLBU_ALLOC_START_ADDR >> 2] + task->heap->heap_size);
> > +                f[LIMA_GP_PLBU_ALLOC_END_ADDR >> 2]);
> >         gp_write(LIMA_GP_CMD, LIMA_GP_CMD_UPDATE_PLBU_ALLOC);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.25.0
> >