lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:52:16 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer v3 On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 02:49:11PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > Patches 4-5 are Vincent's and use very similar code patterns and logic > > between NUMA and load balancer. Patch 6 is a fix to Vincent's work that > > is necessary to avoid serious imbalances being introduced by the NUMA > > Yes the test added in load_too_imbalanced() by patch 5 doesn't seem to > be a good choice. > I haven't remove it as it was done by your patch 6 but it might worth > removing it directly if a new version is needed Aside of that, Vincent's patches look good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists