lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:04:49 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] smp: Allow smp_call_function_single_async() to
 insert locked csd

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 04:31:22PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> This v2 introduced two more patches to let mips/kernel/smp.c and
> kernel/sched/core.c to start using the new feature, then we can drop
> the customized implementations.
> 
> One thing to mention is that cpuidle_coupled_poke_pending is another
> candidate that we can consider, however that cpumask is special in
> that it's not only used for singleton test of the per-vcpu csd when
> injecting new calls, but also in cpuidle_coupled_any_pokes_pending()
> or so to check whether there's any pending pokes.  In that sense it
> should be good to still keep the mask because it could be faster than
> looping over each per-cpu csd.
> 
> Patch 1 is the same as v1, no change.  Patch 2-3 are new ones.
> 
> Smoke tested on x86_64 only.
> 
> Please review, thanks.

Ping?

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists