lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:09:01 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <>
To:     "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] spi: cadence-quadpsi: Add support for the Cadence
 QSPI controller

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:18:10PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> On 14/2/2020 9:09 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This will unconditionally handle the interrupt regardless of if the
> > hardware was actually flagging an interrupt which will break shared
> > interrupts and the fault handling code in genirq.

> Yes, you're correct, it doesn't check unconditionally, will update the
> INT flag in the INT_STATUS register after successful completion of
> read/write operation.
> but in this case it is dedicated to qspi-interrupt,not shared with any other
> HW/SW interrupts.

Currently, on the system you're looking at.  Given that this is already
a widely reused IP there's no guarantee that this will always be the
case, and like I say even without sharing it also defeats the fault
handling code.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists